Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
Open source is when the source is open. Simple as that. The license then determines what rights are given or reserved. The lion's share of my open source work is under MIT, the most permissive license. Love it. I've done none under GPL, because I don't need code dump charity.
Open source is amazing in all it's many shapes and sizes. I use a lot of GPL software, even if I don't care to use that license for my own work. And lots of folks are already contributing to Fizzy under O'Saasy terms. Accept the gifts or don't 🤷♂️ https://t.co/XlaJRj1w31
Started a 300 challenge in 2019 300 workouts a year, every year (which averages out to about 5-6 workouts a week) good forcing function for consistency slack off a week or two = two a days, extra workouts, hikes, runs, swims, or whatever it takes to get you moving I just completed year 6 of the challenge along with some friends I think getting your fitness in check sets a good foundation for the rest of your life - work, family, and energy overall join us in January for year 7
creator & social strategist // ex @a16zcrypto, @linkedin, @snap
LinkedIn just scrapped its APM program and replaced it with a radical new approach to product development that fully embraces what AI makes possible. It's called the "Full Stack Builder" program. The FSB program teaches employees to build, design, and ship products from idea to production, with the help of their custom-built AI. They even introduced a “Full Stack Builder” title, with a full career ladder, and I strongly believe this will be a model for how established companies transform themselves to be AI-native. In my chat with their CPO, Tomer Cohen (@cohentomer), shares: 🔸 Why the traditional product development model is broken 🔸 The Full Stack Builder model 🔸 Three pillars of making FSB work: platform, agents, and culture (culture matters most) 🔸 What it takes to build these specialized agents 🔸 Why off-the-shelf AI tools never work on enterprise code without customization 🔸 Why top performers adopt AI tools fastest 🔸 Change management tactics: celebrating wins, making tools exclusive, updating performance reviews Listen now 👇 • YouTube: https://t.co/fN60HLXL5s • Spotify: https://t.co/b6pCr20Dgh • Apple: https://t.co/xWYJcHnor2 Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 @TrustVanta — Automate compliance. Simplify security: https://t.co/JHcQhNsK42 🏆 @Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: https://t.co/8iUp8fgO4x 🏆 @MiroHQ — The AI Innovation Workspace where teams discover, plan, and ship breakthrough products:
Deeply researched product, growth, and career advice
There is beauty in growing your student into your collaborator. Sir Hardy to Ramanujan. Professor Ono to me. And now, a group of brightest mathematicians at Axiom @axiommathai to our AI. The Thue equations we worked with are on the board. Our paper was an instance of traditional computation assisting discoveries on modular forms, elliptic curves, and K3 surfaces.
@axiommathai : careers@axiommath.ai
Want to get a weekly curated list of top GitHub repos and similar posts like this? Join our newsletter and get them straight to your inbox 👇 https://t.co/fIQKe7W5O3
We're sharing/showcasing best of @github projects/repos. Follow to stay in loop. Promoting Open-Source Contributions. UNOFFICIAL, but followed by github
Love how calling Fizzy open source is triggering some because our MIT-derived O'Saasy License reserves SaaS monetization rights to us as creators. Same nerds will demoan lack of "sustainable OSS" or argue that handing over all changes under GPL is akshually freedom. Hilarious.
It takes a particular kind of hybris to think you can narrow down the definition of "open" and "source" to match your pet interpretation, and believe everyone else just has to bow to that dominion. No.