开启时会模糊预览图，关闭后正常显示
This is an example how you can add guidelines to your (or someone else's) Laravel packages, to be recognized with boost:install.
~20 yrs in web-dev, now mostly Laravel. My Laravel courses: https://t.co/HRUAJdMRZL My Youtube channel: https://t.co/qPQAkaov2F
RT @CastelionCorp: December 5th, 2025 Castelion saved its biggest flight test to cap off the year. We’d like to extend a massive thank yo…
Chicken Sexing @Cantos & Host @MotionBlurFM // Prev American Dynamism @a16z // Finding founders building the future
I applied for a writing gig once, and the guy interviewing me, (another white guy), explicitly said: "We really want you, but we have too many white guys and need to hire a woman of color first. Can you wait a bit?" Honestly I appreciated the candor, despite the moral repugnancy. I used to believe that being anti-DEI meant you must be racist. But now I understand that being pro-DEI means taking away opportunities from people solely based on their race, disproportionately harming white and asian people. DEI is racism. And supporting it, or voting for parties that endorse it, means you believe whites and asians are less deserving of opportunity purely because of their skin color. I think this is part of why boomers are so confused by young white men abandoning the democratic party, especially last election. Boomers never felt the harms of DEI on their careers because the harms were primarily levied on millennials. And to them, being anti-DEI still means being racist. But for millennial white men, it's hard to understand how your parents could be actively voting against your ability to succeed. I could never vote for a party that explicitly says it wants to take opportunities away from my children because they happen to be white and asian. In an effort to be maximally "antiracist" the democratic party became the racist one. Horseshoe theory wins again.
Author (Husk, Crypto Confidential): https://t.co/L2COrV5QA3 Building: https://t.co/HMcbuBhTP3 Teaching: https://t.co/Dy0FsZHQaz
RT @rcmisk: IdeaVerify Live Test 2 - FlowPilot Ok chose this idea from @arvidkahl Podscan's Business Ideas for 2025-12-15 Newsletter: I'm…
Building https://t.co/od97B0HVrk and https://t.co/666FnyVVE0 in Public. Raising all the boats with kindness. 🎙️ https://t.co/6w69DZmi8H · ✍️ https://t.co/lpnor5rsTW
RT @kmad: Achieving 20%+ improvement in structured extraction tasks using @DSPyOSS and GEPA Building on a blog post from @CleanlabAI I wa…
Asst professor @MIT EECS & CSAIL (@nlp_mit). Author of https://t.co/VgyLxl0oa1 and https://t.co/ZZaSzaRaZ7 (@DSPyOSS). Prev: CS PhD @StanfordNLP. Research @Databricks.
a world full of agents should prob default to saving and logging WAY more human and agent outputs every decent idea for a project, blog, riff, goal, etc immediately goes in my notes because I know that an agent can do “something” with that later: - make connections between notes, do research for me - build stuff - talk through things with me and when we build agents, I’ve never regretted logging everything, there’s a lot to be learned from data and human content, storing that is the first step in making it usable later also, I never remember anything. it’s why I decided to add this tweet outline to my notes before sleeping we’re not quite at the moment of fully personal ambient AI for everyone, but storing our stuff is a good first step to make it usable today while we all figure out always on, ambient AI
agents, harnesses, and evals @LangChainAI, prev @awscloud, phd cs @ temple