开启时会模糊预览图，关闭后正常显示
not my definition of legibility but good read and i think the point stands across my experience at big and small teams i have an add-on view that the move towards legibility as companies grow is directly related to “credit assignment” and personal career growth that selfishly forces tracking things minutely when a team is small, everyone sees what everyone is doing and you can “just tell” who’s killing it through regular interactions. so growth and credit is natural but as organizations grow, you literally cannot track everything so any vested interest in getting credit forces documenting it and making sure other people know “i did this thing” the very act of doing that tracking optimizes for things that get more credit often at the expense of crucial but small quick fixes or unsexy things like testing this def isn’t the whole story but feels like an accurate dynamic that distinguishes big and small teams, and a big reason why if you “just wanna build and do things” small teams are amazing for the velocity, learning, and likeminded people
building agents and harnesses, prev @awscloud, phd cs @ temple
there’s a phrase in business: follow the money. some people on this app think that means selling out. it doesn’t. it’s just data. stay in the game long enough and you'll get pulled toward the business you were actually meant to build. ignore that pull and you spend years spinning your wheels, trying to force tarpit ideas that make $0 entrepreneurship isn’t about proving a point, it’s about doubling down on what works and ruthlessly moving on from what doesn't every founder has different strengths, so the “right” business is different for everyone. anyone chirping from the sidelines can fuck right off.
https://t.co/zSf5Z2H78P https://t.co/ryMAyS77qn https://t.co/Gm6gdHaLgp On a mission to inspire 1B people to build stuff!
last 7 days of my new couples app, after found content product fit :) 5M+ views for $0 not too shabby
all time, 6 weeks into the challenge from 0 to $1 to $10000 :D?
The biggest problem with Polymarket is it doesn't provide a return for the exponential risk that time introduces. For example, placing a bet for something that might happen in 2030 would be silly, it is so far away anything could happen but the return is minimal. Bets should be time-weighted. "early adopters" should win like in financial markets. Maybe an interest-like mechanism could work.
All Things Engineering. Electrical, Mechanical, Software, Firmware, AI, Security and everything in between. Specialize in custom HW/FW/SW for motor control
RT @indie_maker_fox: 🎉 MkDollar 开发进展 已实现产品增删改（更新图片和分类等信息）、支持产品参与促销活动、支持产品申请加入外链列表、支持管理产品的外链提交状态等。 首次既在推特上公开构建，也在discord中公开构建 https://t.c…
🔥 The best AI SaaS boilerplate - https://t.co/VyNtTs0jSX 🚀 The best directory boilerplate with AI - https://t.co/wEvJ1Dd8aR 🎉 https://t.co/bh1RxeERuY & https://t.co/zubXJCoY92 & https://t.co/tfQf8T7gGF
RT @pmarca: David Sacks @DavidSacks is a throwback to the era of American greatness in which the most capable private sector citizens selfl…