开启时会模糊预览图，关闭后正常显示
Day 2 at NeurIPS If you're working on AI creative tools, come find me - I'll be the one in a skirt 🙃 Content creation & editing is such a fruitful area right now, and I love to chat with folks who are curious about startups!
Partner @a16z AI 🤖 and twin to @omooretweets | Investor in @elevenlabsio, @krea_ai, @bfl_ml, @hedra_labs, @wabi, @WaveFormsAI, @ViggleAI, & more
RT @a16z: >100 trillion token analysis of reasoning model usage over time Full piece from @MaikaThoughts, @AnjneyMidha, @xanderatallah, an…
CEO @OpenRouterAI, the largest LLM marketplace. Previously: co-founder & CTO @OpenSea.
it’s unrealistic but imagine a big company like @AnthropicAI wants a scheduler that has an api to tie into their own native workflows with existing customer base to propel it forward, 1.4 million is nothing to them still it’s just for fun, please know this, my listing is for fun
curious guy creating things @ https://t.co/HXWladhJaA - up and coming wife guy
In the world where all these permissively licensed code fragments are used to power combat drones and military vehicles, maybe it is a good thing that we're exploring a more restrictive kind of licensing for the software we write?
Building https://t.co/od97B0HVrk and https://t.co/666FnyVVE0 in Public. Raising all the boats with kindness. 🎙️ https://t.co/6w69DZmi8H · ✍️ https://t.co/lpnor5rsTW
guys i’ll be honest, it’s not realistic to think you can sell your $20k/month SaaS for one million four hundred twenty thousand and sixty nine dollars… but it sure would be funny
it’s unrealistic but imagine a big company like @AnthropicAI wants a scheduler that has an api to tie into their own native workflows with existing customer base to propel it forward, 1.4 million is nothing to them still it’s just for fun, please know this, my listing is for fun
Trying to wrap my head around this. Fizzy is open source, as in "source fully available." Openly. You know, like "open" "source." Licensed under terms that allow you to run it for free, but not monetize it. Now, people say, this is no true "open-source" Scotsman. Have I misunderstood what OSS was all my life? Just as anyone is free to open- or closed-source their code, they can add any license to their work. And just because the most permissive (MIT) or most restrictive "allowed" "open-source" licenses (AGPL) permit monetizing that software, doesn't mean that only "free" (as in lunch) software can be "open-source." If the source is open, it's open-source. Right? Right!?
In the world where all these permissively licensed code fragments are used to power combat drones and military vehicles, maybe it is a good thing that we're exploring a more restrictive kind of licensing for the software we write?