Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
平地大桥 literally means «large bridge over flat land» and I suspect there are dozens of these «Pingdi bridges» in China. It's an annoying language
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1
RT @ThrillaRilla369: Ozempic proved that the "body positive" people wanted to be in shape all along, they just weren't willing to work for…
🇪🇺 https://t.co/NdorAWrhrB @euacc 📸 https://t.co/lAyoqmT9Hv $115K/m 🏡 https://t.co/1oqUgfDEsx $36K/m 🛰 https://t.co/ZHSvI2wRou $42K/m 🌍 https://t.co/UXK5AFra0o $14K/m 👙 https://t.co/RyXpqGvdBB $14K/m 💾 https://t.co/M1hEUBB6da $6K
So I'm, too, not a huge fan of GPT 5.2... I've used it a bit, and I never seen a terrible response from it, but I'm also yet to see any instance where it outperforms Opus 4.5. For everything I'm doing currently, Opus 4.5 has me covered, and anything it can't do, GPT 5.2 can't either. Also I hate how unbearably slow this model is if you want it to be decent, Opus 4.5 baseline (no thinking) is way smarter. In a way, it feels like Opus 4.5 is basically on the limit of what the whole LLM architecture can do. It can't do anything that requires "real intelligence", whatever that is (and LLMs are *not* improving at that)... and it can do everything that requires just "mechanical coding", whatever that is (and LLMs are nearly perfect at that). (Not saying LLMs won't keep improving, just how my intuition kinda assesses the situation.) So yea GPT 5.2 is a great model but I honestly just don't see where my limited self would need it...
Kind / Bend / HVM / INets / λCalculus
So I'm, too, not a huge fan of GPT 5.2... I've used it a bit, and I never seen a terrible response from it, but I'm also yet to see any instance where it outperforms Opus 4.5. For everything I'm doing currently, Opus 4.5 has me covered, and anything it can't do, GPT 5.2 can't either. Also I hate how unbearably slow this model is if you want it to be decent, Opus 4.5 baseline (no thinking) is way smarter. In a way, it feels like Opus 4.5 is basically on the limit of what the whole LLM architecture can do. It can't do anything that requires "real intelligence", whatever that is (and LLMs are *not* improving at that)... and it can do everything that requires just "mechanical coding", whatever that is (and LLMs are nearly perfect at that). (Not saying LLMs won't keep improving, just how my intuition kinda assesses the situation.) So yea GPT 5.2 is a great model but I honestly just don't see where my limited self would need it...
Kind / Bend / HVM / INets / λCalculus
1983 National Day Rally Speech, quoted in Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas LKY didn't have a solution. I guess the Mainland, in uhhh… cooperation with the United States, has figured it out.
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1
Impressive collection of copes in replies Everyone looks at the system that has whooped their asses on industrial efficiency and goes «yeah… nah, I wouldn't do it like this mane» sure you wouldn't, and you didn't
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1