Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
Read the essay here: https://t.co/yVdaOHhdnj