Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
#分享 今天分享一个大家可能不常用，但非常有用的新功能 .cursor/rules，这个功能带来了对文件进行细粒度的控制。 简单来说，MDC Rules 告诉 Cursor 在面对大量的上下文时，如何筛选、排序和使用这些信息，从而让 LLM 的回答更精准切符合预期。 一些使用场景： 1. 对规则进行细化，比如对 ts(逻辑)、tsx(组件) 和 css（UI）应用不同的规则 2. Monorepo 下对不同的项目分配不同的规则 👇是一些具体的实操：
2. 在新版的配置中，.cursor/rules 在 Rules Tab 下 其中全局规则在所有对话中会被 cursor 作为上下文提交给 LLM。 而 .cursor/rules 则会根据文件匹配规则按需提交。 之前全局 .cursorrules 已经不建议使用 创建后的规则文件的后缀是 .mdc，项目根目录下可以找到。
Ireland’s introduction to slavery began with Viking raids. Starting in 795 AD, Norse invaders pillaged monastic towns like Armagh and Kildare, capturing Irish men and women as slaves. Many were taken to Scotland, Norway, and Iceland, where they were ransomed, sold, or forced into labor.
In 875, Irish slaves in Iceland staged a rebellion, one of the largest in Europe since the fall of Rome. By 1014, after the pivotal Battle of Clontarf, Viking dominance waned, and thousands of slaves were freed.
分享一些AI课程资料，各位按需自取 【清华大学】DeepSeek从入门到精通(视频课程+PDF) https://t.co/JBw3VuVPjm 【Sora资源最全合集】 https://t.co/r2DKXEXQwT DeepSeek_V3 技术报告 https://t.co/9258eRVWLH DeepSeek_R1论文
DeepSeek使用技巧大全 https://t.co/dN0d4FzyzA deepseek一键部署安装包 https://t.co/BAyeaOdnHL DeepSeek本地部署视频教程+全套安装包 https://t.co/ZXNJKG0NLR deepseek+飞书 批量处理表格+创建教程 https://t.co/cWD7eRJvu2 【AI大模型】-DeepSeek资料汇总
1/3 Russia and the new US administration have the same goals, rip apart the EU by supporting extremist parties and destroying Ukraine as the last bastion and notion of the democratic world. - Long read by Valeriy Pekar - New Reality: A Brief Overview It took a week to piece together the chaos surrounding us. Now, we finally have a clearer picture. While this text could be supplemented with crucial details that will emerge later, I’m publishing it now to introduce this new reality. But first—make yourself some tea. You’ll need it to get through to the end. 1. The end of the old world order The world order based on rules, agreements, and values no longer exists. It was never perfect, but it functioned—until now. Explaining its collapse requires a separate analysis, but in short: developed countries benefited from it, while developing ones sought to dismantle it. At some point, these developing nations—led by China—began catching up. Seeing this, the strongest developed nation, the U.S., decided to shift from preserving the old order to actively dismantling it. That’s why the American people elected Trump—he is not an anomaly but the embodiment of this trend. Before, while some chipped away at the structure, others reinforced it. Now, destruction is happening from both sides, accelerating the collapse. In this “new world without order,” the U.S. will not protect its European or Asian allies. There are no alliances or mutual obligations anymore—only strong nations taking what they want and weak nations suffering the consequences. At least, this is how the new American administration sees it. They are not isolationists—they are expansionists. Their claims over Greenland, Canada, or Panama should not come as a surprise. Of course, this administration is not monolithic. It consists of various factions with different values and interests, but two key groups stand out: - America First wants to destroy the old world order but strengthen the American state to dominate globally. - The Tech Oligarchs (more accurately, techno-fascists) want to destroy not only the world order but also the American state itself, so their tech corporations can rule unchallenged. These factions differ on taxes, intelligence agencies, and migration (the Tech Oligarchs need global talent, while America First opposes immigration). They will eventually clash, but for now, they are united in tearing down the old system. The new America no longer wants to be the world's policeman. It will not defend democracy, spread education, or develop institutions—it only wants your resources. Previously, this was China’s strategy. Now, America adopts it too. The U.S. no longer believes in multilateralism or international institutions. NATO, the WTO, or even the UN could soon face American withdrawal. Musk will argue it’s about saving U.S. funds, Trump will call these institutions dysfunctional, and the Project 2025 faction will claim America can handle aid and security without bureaucrats. 2. What this means for Europe The security pact with Europe—Pax Americana—is over. The U.S. no longer sees Europe as an ally but as a competing power center. America, Russia, and China all share a common interest: weakening, dividing, and dismantling the European Union. They want to break it into isolated, vulnerable markets that can be exploited. It remains unclear how the U.S. envisions European spheres of influence—whether they will plunder it together or if Western Europe will be America’s exclusive domain while Eastern Europe is handed to Russia (as during the Cold War). But what’s clear is that the EU must be broken apart. To achieve this, the U.S. openly backs far-right Euroskeptics (Russia supports both the far-right and far-left). If strong individual leaders emerge in post-EU Europe, America will cooperate with them. For now, however, Washington... 1/3
2/3 ...sees no promising candidates in France, Germany, or the UK. 3. What this means for Russia America views China as its greatest adversary. This has led to what I consider the biggest geopolitical mistake of the 21st century: the belief that Russia can be turned against China. Every U.S. administration has initially attempted a "reset" with Russia, mistakenly treating it as part of Western civilization. These efforts always failed—but only after much damage was done. The current American administration’s biggest fear is the collapse of the Russian regime. Preventing this is now a priority. Two years ago, I warned that America’s fear of Russia losing would soon outweigh its fear of Ukraine losing. That moment has arrived. In his first month in office, Trump ended Russia’s international isolation. Instead of treating it as an aggressor and terrorist state, he presented Russia as a powerful nation that deserves a seat at the table. Sanctions may soon be lifted. Imagine if, during World War II, the U.S. had sent envoys to meet with Hitler instead of supporting Britain, claiming Poland and France were to blame for their own invasion. That’s where we are now. 4. What this means for Ukraine First, U.S. support for Ukraine is over—regardless of who wins the next election. Some Ukrainians believe parts of the American administration “hate” Ukraine while others “love” it. That’s a childish view. The reality is that Ukraine is simply irrelevant to them. The U.S. now has two objectives: - Weaken Europe to make it defenseless. - Strengthen Russia to use it against China. Ukraine stands in the way of both goals—so it must be punished. A new metaphor gaining traction in Washington compares the war to the American Civil War. In this view, Ukraine is a rebellious southern province, and the victorious Union (Russia) will eventually impose order. Foreign powers (the U.S. and EU) should stay out of a “civil war.” 5. What should Ukraine do? - Stop hoping to "win over" the American administration. Ukraine is an obstacle to their plans, not a partner. There is nothing to offer them. - Accept that U.S. aid is ending. The full consequences will be painful, far beyond the loss of USAID. But there is no way to prevent this. - Turn to Europe. Europe cannot survive without Ukraine, and Ukraine cannot survive without Europe. They must stand together or fall together. - Seek allies beyond the U.S. and EU. Turkey is a key player. Other potential allies must be identified. Ukraine must prioritize survival over ideology. 6. Russia’s next move: political war Since Russia cannot defeat Ukraine militarily, it will try to do so politically. That’s why pushing Ukraine into elections before a secure peace deal is disastrous. The U.S. and Russia are now aligned in promoting the idea of "elections first, peace later"—because it's the cheapest way to destroy Ukraine. If Ukraine collapses, it will not just lose statehood—it will lose millions of lives. Russia will mobilize everyone and launch a new wave of imperial expansion—this time into an undefended Europe. Trump wants a Nobel Peace Prize. He believes a ceasefire is enough to win it. But even if a peace deal is signed, and then broken, he will only blame Ukraine for rejecting his "greatest peace plan." 7. What must be done? - Acknowledge the crisis—Ukraine faces an existential threat. Political infighting must end, and leadership must unite the nation in survival. - Hold a strong, independent stance. Ukraine will not accept any terms that jeopardize its survival. - Improve governance and efficiency in every sector—military, economy, defense industry, and energy. - Mobilize allies while there is still time, with Europe as the priority... 2/3
No, a PM at Cash App or Venmo or similar figures out the check integration in about one tenth the time it would take a single federal agency to go through an RFP process, and then they get a nice big bonus, at no cost to the taxpayer.
I work for the Internet and am an advisor to @stripe. These are my personal opinions unless otherwise noted.
Me: Ah a nice relaxing Monday where I can finally get some work done. DOGE: Have you ever heard of checks?! Me: %{*]% it.
Me: I don’t do partisan politics. Twitter the Sumerian bird demon: Got it. Me: Which is why I work in a painfully boring infrastructural field. Twitter: Oh sure. Me: That no one hates each other over. Twitter: Yeah. Me: So just writing the truth won’t summon a mob. *curse starts*