Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
Ohhh. Of course. “Ramanujan”. Of course it’s from Vaswani. And I 100% believe these scores can generalize. We’ve got a new frontier open lab in the west boys. Prime Intellect using this base in 3…2…
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1
1998年，苹果濒临破产，账上的钱只够支撑几个月。当时，乔布斯刚回到这个他一手创立又被自己“赶”出去的公司。 所有人都在讨论裁员、收缩业务，甚至有人说“只要能活下去，什么都可以做”。 但乔布斯在一次高管会议上，平静地说：“我们的目标不是扭亏为盈，而是做出最好的产品。” 这句话让在场的人愣住了。Jony Ive后来回忆，当时公司的资金链已经快断了，每个人心里都像悬着一块石头。 但乔布斯坚持认为，苹果的本质不是“赚钱的机器”，而是“创造产品的公司”。 他带着团队砍掉了70%的产品线，把所有资源集中到3款核心产品上。 当时有人质疑：“这样会不会太冒险？万一失败了，公司就彻底完了。” 乔布斯的回答很简单：“如果我们只做能快速赚钱的产品，也许能撑过这个季度，但一年后呢？我们会再次陷入困境。只有做出真正好的产品，苹果才能真正活下来。” 后来的故事大家都知道了。iMac的横空出世，不仅让苹果起死回生，更重塑了整个科技行业。当人们看到那个半透明的彩色电脑时，感受到的不仅是产品的创新，更是一种信念——只要坚持做对的事，就没有翻不过的坎。 Jony Ive说，乔布斯的哲学其实很朴素：“我们的工作不是为了给苹果赚钱，而是尽我们所能做出最好的产品。”这句话在苹果最艰难的时候，给了所有人最坚定的方向。它告诉我们，无论身处顺境还是逆境，真正的价值从来不是短期的利益，而是对本质的坚守和对品质的追求。 这或许就是优秀企业和普通企业的区别：前者在迷茫时能守住初心，后者在困境中容易迷失方向。而乔布斯用行动证明，当你专注于创造价值，价值自然会以意想不到的方式回归。
相比而言，有的独立开发者号称1个人1年做20款产品，带了不好的理念和风气...
I always get a little nervous when public intellectuals develop a deep interest in mortality later in life. It’s a common arc, and one that doesn’t play so well with the rank and file. You see this in religious conversion often, where everyone is happy to welcome someone new; it’s beautiful how seriously some converts take a faith. But easy to forget they started wrestling with certain ideas six months ago while the quieter cradle to graves have spent a lifetime marinating in them. Wisdom comes from time. And the loudest, most fervent voices often forget that.
Co-Founder, American Dynamism. General Partner @a16z. Catholic. Mother. American. 🇺🇸 🚀💪
Very tasteful but the subtitle stream is gibberish like a bad anime translation. Or is it just French?
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1
doesn't matter if they lose their job, doesn't matter if warehousing them wastes the taxes paid by 10 productive citizens. We've been trained to treat shareholder value as an unconditional good, but whole industries can work like a crackhead ripping copper out of air conditioners
energy snob
That jump in private prison stocks was investors pricing in the likely policy result of the 2024 election, and suddenly the quotas and the arrests of legal immigrants like my friend make perfect sense: all that matters is that someone is detained, doesn't matter who they are,
doesn't matter if they lose their job, doesn't matter if warehousing them wastes the taxes paid by 10 productive citizens. We've been trained to treat shareholder value as an unconditional good, but whole industries can work like a crackhead ripping copper out of air conditioners