探索 | Thread Easy - 展開 Twitter 線程｜閱讀、摘要與創作

This is the whole of reasoning by Banania/Caplan/other ghouls. Magic Dirt Hypothesis, Liberty, LKY worship, Market Efficiency, YIMBY Nietzscheanism, that’s all just window dressing. These folks are Elite Human Capital and want their cute little Singapores amid oceans of squalor.

We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)

Mon Dec 08 23:56:15

RT @mcarbin: Modern computation interfaces with a physical world that is continuous...noisy...analog. My group and community's research ov…

Asst professor @MIT EECS & CSAIL (@nlp_mit). Author of https://t.co/VgyLxl0oa1 and https://t.co/ZZaSzaRaZ7 (@DSPyOSS). Prev: CS PhD @StanfordNLP. Research @Databricks.

Omar Khattab

Mon Dec 08 23:50:30

So the subtlety of this question is: If one looks at it from the perspective of the overall Global Brain on the planet today, it's clear that the GB of 2025 is building the GB of 2026 and both human and artificial intelligence are involved... the question is are we more focused on the human part of the GB or the AI part of the GB? Now we tend to be focused more on the human part for historical bias reasons, but perhaps the ASI looking back will have it own reasons to focus more on the emerging-AI part ;-) .... Of course the real answer is totally "a fair bit of both" as most sensible and open-minded people will know already...

Building Beneficial AGI - CEO @asi_alliance @singularitynet, @true_agi , Interim CEO @Singularity_Fi, @SophiaVerse_AI, Chair @opencog @HumanityPlus @iCog_Labs

Ben Goertzel

Mon Dec 08 23:49:08

I do think many people over-claim on the level to which LLMs can do interesting new things. But to say they "cannot generate knowledge" is simply wrong. Like humans, they can interact with the world, and generate knowledge in the process.

🇦🇺 Co-founder: @AnswerDotAI & @FastDotAI ; Prev: professor @ UQ; Stanford fellow; @kaggle president; @fastmail/@enlitic/etc founder https://t.co/16UBFTX7mo

Jeremy Howard

Mon Dec 08 23:48:48

This is incorrect. LLMs can call tools to get info and change about the outside world, including viewing videos, moving robotic arms, etc. The pic below shows a minimal falsifying example. The value of this number squared is new information—it's never been documented before.

I do think many people over-claim on the level to which LLMs can do interesting new things. But to say they "cannot generate knowledge" is simply wrong. Like humans, they can interact with the world, and generate knowledge in the process.

Jeremy Howard

Mon Dec 08 23:48:48

小伙伴推荐了一个很好看的剧《唐朝诡事录》，当前一共出了 3 季了，拍得非常好，没有用那种熟悉的明星，演员功底到位，剧里的破案逻辑清晰悬疑剧，用心好剧，假如你剧荒，非常非常推荐，好看的。

Father of Pake • MiaoYan • Mole • XRender

Tw93

Mon Dec 08 23:45:00

探索

Newest first — browse tweet threads

探索

Newest first — browse tweet threads

This is the whole of reasoning by Banania/Caplan/other ghouls. Magic Dirt Hypothesis, Liberty, LKY worship, Market Efficiency, YIMBY Nietzscheanism, that’s all just window dressing. These folks are Elite Human Capital and want their cute little Singapores amid oceans of squalor.

RT @mcarbin: Modern computation interfaces with a physical world that is continuous...noisy...analog. My group and community's research ov…

I do think many people over-claim on the level to which LLMs can do interesting new things. But to say they "cannot generate knowledge" is simply wrong. Like humans, they can interact with the world, and generate knowledge in the process.

This is incorrect. LLMs can call tools to get info and change about the outside world, including viewing videos, moving robotic arms, etc. The pic below shows a minimal falsifying example. The value of this number squared is new information—it's never been documented before.

小伙伴推荐了一个很好看的剧《唐朝诡事录》，当前一共出了 3 季了，拍得非常好，没有用那种熟悉的明星，演员功底到位，剧里的破案逻辑清晰悬疑剧，用心好剧，假如你剧荒，非常非常推荐，好看的。