I haven't taken notes for three months. It's not because I'm lazy, it's because I've discovered something: Traditional notebooks are a scam. You think you're recording knowledge, but what you're actually doing is: Copy what others have said with your own hands. Then I just left it there and never looked at it again. NotebookLM taught me one thing: The value of notes lies not in recording, but in the dialogue. My current approach is: Throw all the information at it, and then start asking questions. What are counterexamples to this viewpoint? Can these two theories be combined? "What would happen if I used this framework to analyze my project?" It wasn't helping me take notes; it was forcing me to think. True learning is never about memorizing things. It's not about what questions you can ask with it. NotebookLM has been waiting for our questions.
Loading thread detail
Fetching the original tweets from X for a clean reading view.
Hang tight—this usually only takes a few seconds.