Projects that don't study on-chain airdrops lack familiarity with on-chain interactions, sensitivity to industry ecosystem development, and the ability to counteract on-chain airdrops. Today, I explored three methods for batch-manipulating hundreds of wallets for on-chain airdrops.
The first step is to batch generate hundreds of accounts for your use. You can use any language library that ccointool.apprve Digital Signature Algorithm to batch generate accounts, but the easiest way is to use the bulk wallet creation tool cointool (https://t.co/Z0EzaEg7Xk). Remember to shut down all network services when creating accounts and properly store your keys and mnemonics.
The second step is to maintain an account, but you can determine whether to maintain an account based on the ROI of the project you want to profit from. We will use the conditions of Optimism as an example to learn how to maintain an account (so that the project side thinks you are a high-value account, not a profit-making account) - Active on-chain operations, frequently conducting on-chain transactions - Participated in DAO governance voting - Be the person in charge of a multi-signature account and have executed transactions - Gitcoin donors
The third step is to start batch operations using the hundreds of wallets we created and maintain. There are three common patterns in the market based on the learning curve, difficulty of daily operations, cost of use, and risk. Scientists/employees are welcome to add to this.
Solution 1 - Using a fingerprint browser offers the lowest risk, the highest learning curve, and the highest cost. Using a fingerprint browser like AdsPower, we can use IP proxying, cookie isolation, and browser fingerprint obfuscation or camouflage to prevent project owners from identifying the thief. We can use the fingerprint browser platform to simultaneously launch dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of servers, automatically configure the Little Fox wallet, and perform both on-chain and off-chain operations.
Option 2 - Opening multiple Chrome browsers on the same desktop browser has medium risk, a low learning curve, and a high time coblog.csdn.net/qq_38161040/ar…e following guide to set up multiple independent Chrome browsers on your computer with different plugins. Create multiple shortcuts, each with its own folder containing the configuration file. However, this is manual and carries the risk of using the same IP address, making it suitable for most non-technical tinkerers.
Option 3 - Automatically log in and out of the Little Fox Wallet using the same browser. This approach has high risk, a medium learning curve, and low time cost. By using Windows automatic macro recording, you can record the actions of logging in to a new wallet account, performing interactive operations, and logging out of the current account into a looping macro task, which can then be played back hundreds of times. This approach is more risky, but most project owners will not review it. It requires minimal computer configuration and can be automated.
In conclusion, no matter how you approach web3—development, marketing, entrepreneurship, investment, or simply reaping the benefits—you'll need to engage with it extensively on-chain. Be open to learning from other projects' models and the behaviors of different groups within the ecosystem, so you can better plan your next steps. We welcome your feedback.