Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
Is this the 21st century version of calling the square root of negative one "imaginary" because of its unfamiliarity?
Wonderer. Amor fati. Scaling trust.
The folks who insist on arguing that quantum mechanics doesn't need imaginary numbers seem so silly to me. We know that structureless particles with finite angular momentum exist. Why make life harder by insisting that we describe their behavior using only real numbers?
Is this the 21st century version of calling the square root of negative one "imaginary" because of its unfamiliarity?
真正的复利是让更多认识你、认可你
Programmer ｜ Growth Coach｜Helping creators build their personal brand on X 公众号：PandaTalk8
RT @arcprize: ARC Prize 2025 - Paper Submission Due Tomorrow Final submissions to the ARC Prize 2025 Paper Prize are due on November 9, 20…
Co-founder @ndea. Co-founder @arcprize. Creator of Keras and ARC-AGI. Author of 'Deep Learning with Python'.
RT @dongxi_nlp: 最近跟印度团队一起工作。 感觉印度工程师普遍勤奋，靠谱，友好，言必行行必果，并且表达能力出色。 精神风貌非常像2010年左右外企鼎盛时期的中国工程师。
Programmer ｜ Growth Coach｜Helping creators build their personal brand on X 公众号：PandaTalk8
https://t.co/3XU7M5DrHV
We're sharing/showcasing best of @github projects/repos. Follow to stay in loop. Promoting Open-Source Contributions. UNOFFICIAL, but followed by github