LogoThread Easy
  • 탐색
  • 스레드 작성
LogoThread Easy

트위터 스레드의 올인원 파트너

© 2025 Thread Easy All Rights Reserved.

탐색

Newest first — browse tweet threads

Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly

To be clear, I would grant that Anglos alone constitute a viable «civilization». In a sense, the potency of first tier European nations is the whole problem. Anglos, Germans, French all could articulate a comprehensive solo civilizational project. «Ze Europe» is a straitjacket.

To be clear, I would grant that Anglos alone constitute a viable «civilization». In a sense, the potency of first tier European nations is the whole problem. Anglos, Germans, French all could articulate a comprehensive solo civilizational project. «Ze Europe» is a straitjacket.

We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1

avatar for Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
Mon Dec 15 06:10:10
rlly interested in digging into the HOW of models performing better in their own scaffolds (ex: Claude in CC)

for Tasks the presence of important tools makes sense but I haven’t seen granular rollout metrics to measure this.  questions like:
- is the built-in ToDo/Planning tool used often and thus is important in successful rollouts?
- how sensitive is the model to changing tool descriptions?  is it simple prompt fixes?  how long does more RL take to use the new tool well?
- etc

+ cross scaffold experiments are interesting here like Kimi in CC harness out of the box —> Kimi fine tuned in CC harness

rlly interested in digging into the HOW of models performing better in their own scaffolds (ex: Claude in CC) for Tasks the presence of important tools makes sense but I haven’t seen granular rollout metrics to measure this. questions like: - is the built-in ToDo/Planning tool used often and thus is important in successful rollouts? - how sensitive is the model to changing tool descriptions? is it simple prompt fixes? how long does more RL take to use the new tool well? - etc + cross scaffold experiments are interesting here like Kimi in CC harness out of the box —> Kimi fine tuned in CC harness

building agents and harnesses, prev @awscloud, phd cs @ temple

avatar for Viv
Viv
Mon Dec 15 06:07:21
RT @tobyordoxford: The James Webb Space Telescope has started capturing images of galaxies so far away that they are causally disconnected…

RT @tobyordoxford: The James Webb Space Telescope has started capturing images of galaxies so far away that they are causally disconnected…

avatar for Joscha Bach
Joscha Bach
Mon Dec 15 06:04:32
This is super easy, not some autistic super genius thing

You just cross your eyes and overlap the two images

And the diff shows up as flashing in your eyes

I learnt this with those fake 3d magazines you could get as a kid, 2 images and then you cross your eyes to see the 3d

This is super easy, not some autistic super genius thing You just cross your eyes and overlap the two images And the diff shows up as flashing in your eyes I learnt this with those fake 3d magazines you could get as a kid, 2 images and then you cross your eyes to see the 3d

🇪🇺 https://t.co/NdorAWrhrB @euacc 📸 https://t.co/lAyoqmT9Hv $115K/m 🏡 https://t.co/1oqUgfDEsx $36K/m 🛰 https://t.co/ZHSvI2wRou $42K/m 🌍 https://t.co/UXK5AFra0o $14K/m 👙 https://t.co/RyXpqGvdBB $14K/m 💾 https://t.co/M1hEUBB6da $6K

avatar for @levelsio
@levelsio
Mon Dec 15 06:02:11
在中国,你只要能翻墙,你的信息获取效率绝对超过了80%以上的人

如果你看youtube,就能获得更多别人不知道的信息差

倘若你买Newsletter看,你会获得大量的高优质信息

在这些基础上,如果你还懂得去追根溯源,找到这些人分享的源头,那你的信息绝对能超越95%以上的人

大部分人都喜欢通过社交获取信息,但其实这是最低效的方式

因为短短的1-2小时,能谈到的信息全部都是被压缩的,也很少有人愿意免费把自己的经验和盘托出

但实际上如果你去阅读文字,只需要30分钟,你能拿到很多细致的最佳实践

你能看到别人踩过的坑,吃过的亏,总结的经验,和最佳路径

因为文字是广播是资产,但社交是单点的时间投入

你周边能找到的牛人能有几个?

但如果你喜欢阅读,你能找到这个领域内最牛的人,跟着他学习

当你实践诞生了问题,再去找人交流,探讨,请教。因为你无法找到一个Naval的替身去询问他观点

不过,或许也可以基于Naval的世界观,综合AI的能力,构建一个有偏见的AI Mentor出来了

在中国,你只要能翻墙,你的信息获取效率绝对超过了80%以上的人 如果你看youtube,就能获得更多别人不知道的信息差 倘若你买Newsletter看,你会获得大量的高优质信息 在这些基础上,如果你还懂得去追根溯源,找到这些人分享的源头,那你的信息绝对能超越95%以上的人 大部分人都喜欢通过社交获取信息,但其实这是最低效的方式 因为短短的1-2小时,能谈到的信息全部都是被压缩的,也很少有人愿意免费把自己的经验和盘托出 但实际上如果你去阅读文字,只需要30分钟,你能拿到很多细致的最佳实践 你能看到别人踩过的坑,吃过的亏,总结的经验,和最佳路径 因为文字是广播是资产,但社交是单点的时间投入 你周边能找到的牛人能有几个? 但如果你喜欢阅读,你能找到这个领域内最牛的人,跟着他学习 当你实践诞生了问题,再去找人交流,探讨,请教。因为你无法找到一个Naval的替身去询问他观点 不过,或许也可以基于Naval的世界观,综合AI的能力,构建一个有偏见的AI Mentor出来了

Believing is seeing

avatar for Yangyi
Yangyi
Mon Dec 15 06:01:26
This week after lots of work we’ll finally be moving into our first apartment! 🤩

Will post pics once we’re done

This week after lots of work we’ll finally be moving into our first apartment! 🤩 Will post pics once we’re done

I build stuff. On my way to making $1M 💰 My projects 👇

avatar for Florin Pop 👨🏻‍💻
Florin Pop 👨🏻‍💻
Mon Dec 15 05:56:40
  • Previous
  • 1
  • More pages
  • 735
  • 736
  • 737
  • More pages
  • 5634
  • Next