探索

Newest first — browse tweet threads

Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly

ChatGPT’s new image model really shines in finding the balance between realism and aesthetics …while Nano Banana Pro can feel hyperliteral in how it interprets prompts I gave each an image of my gingerbread house and asked them to make it real - there was a clear winner!

ChatGPT’s new image model really shines in finding the balance between realism and aesthetics …while Nano Banana Pro can feel hyperliteral in how it interprets prompts I gave each an image of my gingerbread house and asked them to make it real - there was a clear winner!

Partner @a16z and twin to @venturetwins | Investor in @gammaapp, @happyrobot_ai, @krea_ai, @tomaauto, @partiful, Salient, @scribenoteinc & more

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore
And, this is day 18 of @venturetwins and I featuring cool new consumer AI launches from this year! Follow along for more 👋

And, this is day 18 of @venturetwins and I featuring cool new consumer AI launches from this year! Follow along for more 👋

Partner @a16z and twin to @venturetwins | Investor in @gammaapp, @happyrobot_ai, @krea_ai, @tomaauto, @partiful, Salient, @scribenoteinc & more

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore
It feels like the end game here is essentially Reddit where every forum is always active. ...but I'm also curious the extent to which people would be comfortable with AI in their smaller group chats, to either liven things up or get things done (ex. book a restaurant res) 👀

It feels like the end game here is essentially Reddit where every forum is always active. ...but I'm also curious the extent to which people would be comfortable with AI in their smaller group chats, to either liven things up or get things done (ex. book a restaurant res) 👀

And, this is day 18 of @venturetwins and I featuring cool new consumer AI launches from this year! Follow along for more 👋

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore
Consumer social is a hard category for AI - the value is human <-> human. @getchatbcc is one of the most clever attempts I've seen, with tens of thousands of users👇 The app hosts group chats where AI helps humans w/ moderation + engagement, ensuring the chat never goes dead.

Consumer social is a hard category for AI - the value is human <-> human. @getchatbcc is one of the most clever attempts I've seen, with tens of thousands of users👇 The app hosts group chats where AI helps humans w/ moderation + engagement, ensuring the chat never goes dead.

It feels like the end game here is essentially Reddit where every forum is always active. ...but I'm also curious the extent to which people would be comfortable with AI in their smaller group chats, to either liven things up or get things done (ex. book a restaurant res) 👀

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore
Year in Review shows what a “first class” app experience could look like inside ChatGPT It’s sophisticated and interactive UI that utilizes the Memory layer…feels reminiscent of WeChat Mini apps I hope third party developers can eventually build like this on the platform!

Year in Review shows what a “first class” app experience could look like inside ChatGPT It’s sophisticated and interactive UI that utilizes the Memory layer…feels reminiscent of WeChat Mini apps I hope third party developers can eventually build like this on the platform!

Partner @a16z and twin to @venturetwins | Investor in @gammaapp, @happyrobot_ai, @krea_ai, @tomaauto, @partiful, Salient, @scribenoteinc & more

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore
I can’t stop thinking about this new AI writing experiment. A journalist + novelist fine tuned a model on her writing, and then had seven readers familiar with her work guess what she wrote and what was AI. None of the readers got more than half right…and many got all wrong 🤯 I would argue AI can now do “functional writing” as well as humans (instructions, educational material, etc.) What I wonder about is “artistic writing” - where the identity of the author matters to the reading experience, similar to provenance in art. I can imagine a world where an author establishes a unique style…and then uses AI to help them generate future writing in that style. Is that “fair” to readers? Should it change how the work is received? I’m also curious about whether AI can generate styles of its own that readers appreciate. Could we see the rise of fully AI authors that create their own writing universes (plotlines, characters, styles), and that human readers prefer to that of human writers? I imagine the answer to this question is yes - but the models will get here faster than readers are willing to accept it (arguably the models are here already!)

I can’t stop thinking about this new AI writing experiment. A journalist + novelist fine tuned a model on her writing, and then had seven readers familiar with her work guess what she wrote and what was AI. None of the readers got more than half right…and many got all wrong 🤯 I would argue AI can now do “functional writing” as well as humans (instructions, educational material, etc.) What I wonder about is “artistic writing” - where the identity of the author matters to the reading experience, similar to provenance in art. I can imagine a world where an author establishes a unique style…and then uses AI to help them generate future writing in that style. Is that “fair” to readers? Should it change how the work is received? I’m also curious about whether AI can generate styles of its own that readers appreciate. Could we see the rise of fully AI authors that create their own writing universes (plotlines, characters, styles), and that human readers prefer to that of human writers? I imagine the answer to this question is yes - but the models will get here faster than readers are willing to accept it (arguably the models are here already!)

Full article here with more on the experiment: https://t.co/EMpE093NDO

avatar for Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore