LogoThread Easy
  • 発見
  • スレッド作成
LogoThread Easy

Twitter スレッドの万能パートナー

© 2025 Thread Easy All Rights Reserved.

探索

Newest first — browse tweet threads

Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly

i was skeptical when @simonw said that "Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP" buuut early indications are this is correct. 

this is the fastest talk ever to pass 100k views here at AIE. its like those 0 - 100m ARR charts but for attention.

@MaheshMurag and @barry_zyj have done it again

i was skeptical when @simonw said that "Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP" buuut early indications are this is correct. this is the fastest talk ever to pass 100k views here at AIE. its like those 0 - 100m ARR charts but for attention. @MaheshMurag and @barry_zyj have done it again

achieve ambition with intentionality, intensity, & integrity - @dxtipshq - @sveltesociety - @aidotengineer - @latentspacepod - @cognition + @smol_ai

avatar for swyx #DevWritersRetreat
swyx #DevWritersRetreat
Wed Dec 10 16:07:57
RT @Dom_Investing: 3 years ago I received my very first dividend, it was 15 cents.

I was hooked from this point on!

Although I can't inve…

RT @Dom_Investing: 3 years ago I received my very first dividend, it was 15 cents. I was hooked from this point on! Although I can't inve…

Founder 📈 @parqetapp Host of 🎙 @minimalempires Prev. @stripe

avatar for Sumit Kumar
Sumit Kumar
Wed Dec 10 16:04:53
Whew, my https://t.co/pUqGI7kwYe newsletter hasn't been sent for a couple days because of this strange postgres error. 

Apparently, when null bytes are IN a record in the database, even a select query fails horribly.

Yikes.

Whew, my https://t.co/pUqGI7kwYe newsletter hasn't been sent for a couple days because of this strange postgres error. Apparently, when null bytes are IN a record in the database, even a select query fails horribly. Yikes.

Building https://t.co/od97B0HVrk and https://t.co/666FnyVVE0 in Public. Raising all the boats with kindness. 🎙️ https://t.co/6w69DZmi8H · ✍️ https://t.co/lpnor5rsTW

avatar for Arvid Kahl
Arvid Kahl
Wed Dec 10 16:04:15
✨Create stunning “Real World × Portal × Anime Character” crossover scenes with this fully modular prompt template! Customize every world you imagine 📷🪄

✨Create stunning “Real World × Portal × Anime Character” crossover scenes with this fully modular prompt template! Customize every world you imagine 📷🪄

Prompt Engineer, dedicated to learning and disseminating knowledge about AI, software engineering, and engineering management.

avatar for 宝玉
宝玉
Wed Dec 10 16:03:42
RT @aiDotEngineer: 🆕 We're back with a trio of RL talks!

@willhang_ and @cathyzbn on OpenAI RFT: https://t.co/HsHlsx4kjz

@willccbb on RL…

RT @aiDotEngineer: 🆕 We're back with a trio of RL talks! @willhang_ and @cathyzbn on OpenAI RFT: https://t.co/HsHlsx4kjz @willccbb on RL…

achieve ambition with intentionality, intensity, & integrity - @dxtipshq - @sveltesociety - @aidotengineer - @latentspacepod - @cognition + @smol_ai

avatar for swyx #DevWritersRetreat
swyx #DevWritersRetreat
Wed Dec 10 16:03:30
Microservices is the software industry’s most successful confidence scam. It convinces small teams that they are “thinking big” while systematically destroying their ability to move at all. It flatters ambition by weaponizing insecurity: if you’re not running a constellation of services, are you even a real company? Never mind that this architecture was invented to cope with organizational dysfunction at planetary scale. Now it’s being prescribed to teams that still share a Slack channel and a lunch table.

Small teams run on shared context. That is their superpower. Everyone can reason end-to-end. Everyone can change anything. Microservices vaporize that advantage on contact. They replace shared understanding with distributed ignorance. No one owns the whole anymore. Everyone owns a shard. The system becomes something that merely happens to the team, rather than something the team actively understands. This isn’t sophistication. It’s abdication.

Then comes the operational farce. Each service demands its own pipeline, secrets, alerts, metrics, dashboards, permissions, backups, and rituals of appeasement. You don’t “deploy” anymore—you synchronize a fleet. One bug now requires a multi-service autopsy. A feature release becomes a coordination exercise across artificial borders you invented for no reason. You didn’t simplify your system. You shattered it and called the debris “architecture.”

Microservices also lock incompetence in amber. You are forced to define APIs before you understand your own business. Guesses become contracts. Bad ideas become permanent dependencies. Every early mistake metastasizes through the network. In a monolith, wrong thinking is corrected with a refactor. In microservices, wrong thinking becomes infrastructure. You don’t just regret it—you host it, version it, and monitor it.

The claim that monoliths don’t scale is one of the dumbest lies in modern engineering folklore. What doesn’t scale is chaos. What doesn’t scale is process cosplay. What doesn’t scale is pretending you’re Netflix while shipping a glorified CRUD app. Monoliths scale just fine when teams have discipline, tests, and restraint. But restraint isn’t fashionable, and boring doesn’t make conference talks.

Microservices for small teams is not a technical mistake—it is a philosophical failure. It announces, loudly, that the team does not trust itself to understand its own system. It replaces accountability with protocol and momentum with middleware. You don’t get “future proofing.” You get permanent drag. And by the time you finally earn the scale that might justify this circus, your speed, your clarity, and your product instincts will already be gone.

Microservices is the software industry’s most successful confidence scam. It convinces small teams that they are “thinking big” while systematically destroying their ability to move at all. It flatters ambition by weaponizing insecurity: if you’re not running a constellation of services, are you even a real company? Never mind that this architecture was invented to cope with organizational dysfunction at planetary scale. Now it’s being prescribed to teams that still share a Slack channel and a lunch table. Small teams run on shared context. That is their superpower. Everyone can reason end-to-end. Everyone can change anything. Microservices vaporize that advantage on contact. They replace shared understanding with distributed ignorance. No one owns the whole anymore. Everyone owns a shard. The system becomes something that merely happens to the team, rather than something the team actively understands. This isn’t sophistication. It’s abdication. Then comes the operational farce. Each service demands its own pipeline, secrets, alerts, metrics, dashboards, permissions, backups, and rituals of appeasement. You don’t “deploy” anymore—you synchronize a fleet. One bug now requires a multi-service autopsy. A feature release becomes a coordination exercise across artificial borders you invented for no reason. You didn’t simplify your system. You shattered it and called the debris “architecture.” Microservices also lock incompetence in amber. You are forced to define APIs before you understand your own business. Guesses become contracts. Bad ideas become permanent dependencies. Every early mistake metastasizes through the network. In a monolith, wrong thinking is corrected with a refactor. In microservices, wrong thinking becomes infrastructure. You don’t just regret it—you host it, version it, and monitor it. The claim that monoliths don’t scale is one of the dumbest lies in modern engineering folklore. What doesn’t scale is chaos. What doesn’t scale is process cosplay. What doesn’t scale is pretending you’re Netflix while shipping a glorified CRUD app. Monoliths scale just fine when teams have discipline, tests, and restraint. But restraint isn’t fashionable, and boring doesn’t make conference talks. Microservices for small teams is not a technical mistake—it is a philosophical failure. It announces, loudly, that the team does not trust itself to understand its own system. It replaces accountability with protocol and momentum with middleware. You don’t get “future proofing.” You get permanent drag. And by the time you finally earn the scale that might justify this circus, your speed, your clarity, and your product instincts will already be gone.

Father of three, Creator of Ruby on Rails + Omarchy, Co-owner & CTO of 37signals, Shopify director, NYT best-selling author, and Le Mans 24h class-winner.

avatar for DHH
DHH
Wed Dec 10 16:03:10
  • Previous
  • 1
  • More pages
  • 1090
  • 1091
  • 1092
  • More pages
  • 5634
  • Next