Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
RT @bookwormengr: @jenzhuscott Like "light years" we need a new term "LLM years" to describe time passing slow compared to how it feels. Le…
Artificial Intelligence @amazon. All views personal!
RT @MechanizeWork: Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canon…
Co-founder of @MechanizeWork Married to @natalia__coelho email: matthew at mechanize dot work
Want to get a weekly curated list of top GitHub repos and similar posts like this? Join our newsletter and get them straight to your inbox 👇 https://t.co/fIQKe7W5O3
We're sharing/showcasing best of @github projects/repos. Follow to stay in loop. Promoting Open-Source Contributions. UNOFFICIAL, but followed by github
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.
Our critics say our work will destroy the world, and many now point to "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" as the canonical case for AI doom. Yet we find the book's arguments extremely weak. The book might make for interesting fiction, but it never presents any evidence.
We're a software company building RL environments to power the full automation of the economy.