Keep on to blur preview images; turn off to show them clearly
I find this so repulsive. I don't want to be part of this needy, anti-Kardashev, DEI civilization. «You must want prosperity today», says Doshi. I've seen that German «prosperity»: those penny-pinching, energy-poor peasants with no greater ambition. Stand on two legs – or KNEEL.
The opposition to what China is doing is just the doctrine of iustum pretium, at greater scale. Gentiles always want to enable producers to live well, even if as a result the whole society is poor. They have to be bullied by outsiders to evolve. Yesterday, Jews. Today, Chinese.
In my experience, this is a bad idea. Specifically, the: - "give them full freedom", and - "have them figure it out" parts For this to work, you'd have to figure it out WITH THEM. Which would take daily work and communication. That can really pay off if you plan to have them long term. Otherwise, hire experienced people for this kind of thing.
https://t.co/zSf5Z2H78P https://t.co/ryMAyS77qn https://t.co/Gm6gdHaLgp On a mission to inspire 1B people to build stuff!
Elon will win the AI race. It's over. I did the math. Space based datacenters cost *half* as much as terrestrial datacenters. (For SpaceX. Musk doesn't have to pay for someone else's high margin. And Musk will continue bringing down cost through scale.) (Natural gas datacenters have lower capex, and higher opex, but turbine production is heavily limited.) Note this only applies to inference. (For training faulty chips constantly have to be swapped out. So in space it might be much in the future. But RL data generation is done through inference. This might be the most computationally demanding part. Along of course with inference usage by the public.)
AI Optimist. Empiricist, not 'rationalist'. Anti world government.
A prompt from @Tsubame_99 for creating playful and high-quality 3D miniature vignettes, depicting any chosen topic in a clean, isometric cartoon style with integrated text. —— Present an exquisite, miniature 3D cartoon-style scene of the user-specified subject, clearly viewed from a 45° top-down perspective. Place the subject's most iconic representation, character, or landmark prominently at the center, complemented by proportionally-sized icons of key elements, symbolic items, charming figures, props, and other details illustrating the subject's core theme or narrative. The scene should be detailed, finely crafted, and playful. Rendered with Cinema 4D, the modeling should be refined, smoothly rounded, and rich in texture, accurately capturing realistic PBR materials. Gentle, lifelike lighting and soft shadows should create a warm, comfortable ambiance. Maintain a clean, minimalist layout and a solid-color background to highlight the primary content. At the top-center of the scene, prominently display the subject name in a large font size. All texts should be displayed in the language specified or entered by the user, without any background, and may subtly overlap with the scene elements to enhance overall design integration. Parameters: Aspect ratio: {User input, default 1:1} Subject Name / Topic: {User input} —— Subject Name / Topic: Squid Game
Prompt Engineer, dedicated to learning and disseminating knowledge about AI, software engineering, and engineering management.
Nobody tries to replicate these papers. I find that insane. Nobody replicated Whale papers either, until they stomped the open source competition into the pavement with R1, proving superiority of their DS-MoE+DSMath+GRPO stack. Now it's default. But they're "small". GDM is GDM.
We're in a race. It's not USA vs China but humans and AGIs vs ape power centralization. @deepseek_ai stan #1, 2023–Deep Time «C’est la guerre.» ®1
RT @hackerdocc: chalice censorship-resistant cross-chain-mixer bridge where the anonymity set is every transaction on every chain — includi…
Root node of the web of threads: https://t.co/ifH80GcLpo